Skip to main content
placeholder image

An integrated approach to assessing abiotic and biotic threats to post-fire plant species recovery: Lessons from the 2019���2020 Australian fire season

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Aim: Existing abiotic and biotic threats to plant species (e.g., disease, drought, invasive species) affect their capacity to recover post-fire. We use a new, globally applicable framework to assess the vulnerability of 26,062 Australian plant species to a suite of active threats after the 2019���2020 fires. Location: Australia. Time period: 2019���2020. Major species studied: Plants. Methods: Spatial data for existing threats and information on species-level susceptibility were combined with estimates of the extent of range burnt in southern Australia (>��22��S) to assign species against 10 criteria into vulnerability categories (high, medium, low, none, data deficient). We explore in detail results for three threats (drought, disease, feral animals), highlighting where impacts from multiple threats ranked high vulnerability may compound to reduce post-fire recovery. Results: Analysis of the full suite of 10 vulnerability criteria, which encompass a broad range of threats, revealed large numbers of species vulnerable to poor post-fire recovery from one or more different hazards (high vulnerability: 1,243 species; medium vulnerability: 2,450 species). Collectively, 457 plant species that burnt extensively (>��50%) across their range are highly vulnerable to poor recovery due to exposure to pre-fire drought conditions (235 species), disease (186 species), or feral animals (97 species). Of these 457 species, 61 are vulnerable to more than one of these three threats, highlighting how a suite of interacting hazards can impact plant recovery after fire. Main conclusions: While fire can renew plant populations by stimulating recruitment and resetting competitive interactions, the presence of existing threats in post-fire landscapes jeopardizes recovery. The simultaneous impact of multiple threats that impact recovery can create a suite of hazards that contribute to declines and, potentially, extinction. Our method for rapid post-fire vulnerability assessment can be applied to large numbers of plant species or other biota in fire affected regions globally.

Publication Date


  • 2022

Citation


  • Gallagher, R. V., Allen, S. P., Mackenzie, B. D. E., Keith, D. A., Nolan, R. H., Rumpff, L., . . . Auld, T. D. (2022). An integrated approach to assessing abiotic and biotic threats to post-fire plant species recovery: Lessons from the 2019���2020 Australian fire season. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(10), 2056-2069. doi:10.1111/geb.13478

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85125648542

Web Of Science Accession Number


Start Page


  • 2056

End Page


  • 2069

Volume


  • 31

Issue


  • 10

Place Of Publication


Abstract


  • Aim: Existing abiotic and biotic threats to plant species (e.g., disease, drought, invasive species) affect their capacity to recover post-fire. We use a new, globally applicable framework to assess the vulnerability of 26,062 Australian plant species to a suite of active threats after the 2019���2020 fires. Location: Australia. Time period: 2019���2020. Major species studied: Plants. Methods: Spatial data for existing threats and information on species-level susceptibility were combined with estimates of the extent of range burnt in southern Australia (>��22��S) to assign species against 10 criteria into vulnerability categories (high, medium, low, none, data deficient). We explore in detail results for three threats (drought, disease, feral animals), highlighting where impacts from multiple threats ranked high vulnerability may compound to reduce post-fire recovery. Results: Analysis of the full suite of 10 vulnerability criteria, which encompass a broad range of threats, revealed large numbers of species vulnerable to poor post-fire recovery from one or more different hazards (high vulnerability: 1,243 species; medium vulnerability: 2,450 species). Collectively, 457 plant species that burnt extensively (>��50%) across their range are highly vulnerable to poor recovery due to exposure to pre-fire drought conditions (235 species), disease (186 species), or feral animals (97 species). Of these 457 species, 61 are vulnerable to more than one of these three threats, highlighting how a suite of interacting hazards can impact plant recovery after fire. Main conclusions: While fire can renew plant populations by stimulating recruitment and resetting competitive interactions, the presence of existing threats in post-fire landscapes jeopardizes recovery. The simultaneous impact of multiple threats that impact recovery can create a suite of hazards that contribute to declines and, potentially, extinction. Our method for rapid post-fire vulnerability assessment can be applied to large numbers of plant species or other biota in fire affected regions globally.

Publication Date


  • 2022

Citation


  • Gallagher, R. V., Allen, S. P., Mackenzie, B. D. E., Keith, D. A., Nolan, R. H., Rumpff, L., . . . Auld, T. D. (2022). An integrated approach to assessing abiotic and biotic threats to post-fire plant species recovery: Lessons from the 2019���2020 Australian fire season. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(10), 2056-2069. doi:10.1111/geb.13478

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85125648542

Web Of Science Accession Number


Start Page


  • 2056

End Page


  • 2069

Volume


  • 31

Issue


  • 10

Place Of Publication