Skip to main content
placeholder image

Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of spot size on the interplay effect, plan robustness, and dose to the organs at risk for lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Methods: The current retrospective study included 13 lung cancer patients. For each patient, small spot (���3��mm) plans and large spot (���8��mm) plans were generated. The Monte Carlo algorithm was used for both robust plan optimization and final dose calculations. Each plan was normalized, such that 99% of the clinical target volume (CTV) received 99% of the prescription dose. Interplay effect was evaluated for treatment delivery starting in two different breathing phases (T0 and T50). Plan robustness was investigated for 12 perturbed scenarios, which combined the isocenter shift and range uncertainty. The nominal and worst-case scenario (WCS) results were recorded for each treatment plan. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were evaluated for the total lung, heart, and esophagus. Results: In comparison to large spot plans, the WCS values of small spot plans at CTV D95%, D96%, D97%, D98%, and D99% were higher with the average differences of 2.2% (range, 0.3%���3.7%), 2.3% (range, 0.5%���4.0%), 2.6% (range, 0.6%���4.4%), 2.7% (range, 0.9%���5.2%), and 2.7% (range, 0.3%���6.0%), respectively. The nominal and WCS mean dose and EUD for the esophagus, heart, and total lung were higher in large spot plans. The difference in NTCP between large spot and small spot plans was up to 1.9% for the total lung, up to 0.3% for the heart, and up to 32.8% for the esophagus. For robustness acceptance criteria of CTV D95% ��� 98% of the prescription dose, seven small spot plans had all 12 perturbed scenarios meeting the criteria, whereas, for 13 large spot plans, there were ���2 scenarios failing to meet the criteria. Interplay results showed that, on average, the target coverage in large spot plans was higher by 1.5% and 0.4% in non-volumetric and volumetric repainting plans, respectively. Conclusion: For robustly optimized PBS lung cancer plans in our study, a small spot machine resulted in a more robust CTV against the setup and range errors when compared to a large spot machine. In the absence of volumetric repainting, large spot PBS lung plans were more robust against the interplay effect. The use of a volumetric repainting technique in both small and large spot PBS lung plans led to comparable interplay target coverage.

Publication Date


  • 2022

Citation


  • Rana, S., & Rosenfeld, A. B. (2022). Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 23(2). doi:10.1002/acm2.13512

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85122407456

Web Of Science Accession Number


Volume


  • 23

Issue


  • 2

Place Of Publication


Abstract


  • Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of spot size on the interplay effect, plan robustness, and dose to the organs at risk for lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Methods: The current retrospective study included 13 lung cancer patients. For each patient, small spot (���3��mm) plans and large spot (���8��mm) plans were generated. The Monte Carlo algorithm was used for both robust plan optimization and final dose calculations. Each plan was normalized, such that 99% of the clinical target volume (CTV) received 99% of the prescription dose. Interplay effect was evaluated for treatment delivery starting in two different breathing phases (T0 and T50). Plan robustness was investigated for 12 perturbed scenarios, which combined the isocenter shift and range uncertainty. The nominal and worst-case scenario (WCS) results were recorded for each treatment plan. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were evaluated for the total lung, heart, and esophagus. Results: In comparison to large spot plans, the WCS values of small spot plans at CTV D95%, D96%, D97%, D98%, and D99% were higher with the average differences of 2.2% (range, 0.3%���3.7%), 2.3% (range, 0.5%���4.0%), 2.6% (range, 0.6%���4.4%), 2.7% (range, 0.9%���5.2%), and 2.7% (range, 0.3%���6.0%), respectively. The nominal and WCS mean dose and EUD for the esophagus, heart, and total lung were higher in large spot plans. The difference in NTCP between large spot and small spot plans was up to 1.9% for the total lung, up to 0.3% for the heart, and up to 32.8% for the esophagus. For robustness acceptance criteria of CTV D95% ��� 98% of the prescription dose, seven small spot plans had all 12 perturbed scenarios meeting the criteria, whereas, for 13 large spot plans, there were ���2 scenarios failing to meet the criteria. Interplay results showed that, on average, the target coverage in large spot plans was higher by 1.5% and 0.4% in non-volumetric and volumetric repainting plans, respectively. Conclusion: For robustly optimized PBS lung cancer plans in our study, a small spot machine resulted in a more robust CTV against the setup and range errors when compared to a large spot machine. In the absence of volumetric repainting, large spot PBS lung plans were more robust against the interplay effect. The use of a volumetric repainting technique in both small and large spot PBS lung plans led to comparable interplay target coverage.

Publication Date


  • 2022

Citation


  • Rana, S., & Rosenfeld, A. B. (2022). Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 23(2). doi:10.1002/acm2.13512

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85122407456

Web Of Science Accession Number


Volume


  • 23

Issue


  • 2

Place Of Publication