Skip to main content
placeholder image

Nursing care practices following a percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of a survey of Australian and New Zealand cardiovascular nurses

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Background: Although there is high-level evidence to guide optimal medical care for percutaneous coronary interventions, there are less explicit guidelines to support nurses in providing care. Aim: This study describes the practice standards and priorities of care of cardiovascular nurses in Australia and New Zealand. Method: Item generation for the survey was informed by an integrative literature review and existing clinical guidelines. A 116-item Web-based survey was administered to cardiovascular nurses, via electronic mail lists of professional cardiovascular nursing organizations, using a secure online data collection system. Results: Data were collected from March 2008 to March 2009. A total of 148 respondents attempted the survey, with 110 (74.3%) completing all items. All respondents were registered nurses with an average of 12.3 (SD, 7.61) years of clinical experience in the cardiovascular setting. A range of practice patterns was evident in ambulation time after percutaneous coronary intervention, methods of sheath removal, pain relief, and patient positioning. Respondents consistently rated psychosocial care a lower priority than other tasks and also identified a knowledge deficit in this area. Conclusion: This survey identified diversity of practice patterns and a range of educational needs. Increasing evidence to support evidence-based practice and guideline development is necessary to promote high-quality care and improved patient outcomes. Copyright �� 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Publication Date


  • 2010

Citation


  • Rolley, J. X., Salamonson, Y., Dennison, C. R., & Davidson, P. M. (2010). Nursing care practices following a percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of a survey of Australian and New Zealand cardiovascular nurses. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(1), 75-84. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181bb419d

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-76649143436

Start Page


  • 75

End Page


  • 84

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication


Abstract


  • Background: Although there is high-level evidence to guide optimal medical care for percutaneous coronary interventions, there are less explicit guidelines to support nurses in providing care. Aim: This study describes the practice standards and priorities of care of cardiovascular nurses in Australia and New Zealand. Method: Item generation for the survey was informed by an integrative literature review and existing clinical guidelines. A 116-item Web-based survey was administered to cardiovascular nurses, via electronic mail lists of professional cardiovascular nursing organizations, using a secure online data collection system. Results: Data were collected from March 2008 to March 2009. A total of 148 respondents attempted the survey, with 110 (74.3%) completing all items. All respondents were registered nurses with an average of 12.3 (SD, 7.61) years of clinical experience in the cardiovascular setting. A range of practice patterns was evident in ambulation time after percutaneous coronary intervention, methods of sheath removal, pain relief, and patient positioning. Respondents consistently rated psychosocial care a lower priority than other tasks and also identified a knowledge deficit in this area. Conclusion: This survey identified diversity of practice patterns and a range of educational needs. Increasing evidence to support evidence-based practice and guideline development is necessary to promote high-quality care and improved patient outcomes. Copyright �� 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Publication Date


  • 2010

Citation


  • Rolley, J. X., Salamonson, Y., Dennison, C. R., & Davidson, P. M. (2010). Nursing care practices following a percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of a survey of Australian and New Zealand cardiovascular nurses. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(1), 75-84. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181bb419d

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-76649143436

Start Page


  • 75

End Page


  • 84

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication