Skip to main content
placeholder image

An allometric comparison of the mitochondria of mammalian and reptilian tissues: The implications for the evolution of endothermy

Journal Article


Abstract


  • The effects of body size and phylogeny on metabolic capacities were examined by comparing the mitochondrial capacities of 6 mammalian and 4 reptilian species representing 100-fold body weight ranges. The mammals examined included 3 eutherian, 2 marsupial and a monotreme species and the reptiles 2 saurian, 1 crocodilian and 1 testudine species. The tissues examined were liver, kidney, brain, heart, lung and skeletal muscle. Allometric equations were derived for tissue weights, mitochondrial volume densities, internal mitochondrial membrane surface area densities, tissue mitochondrial membrane surface areas both per gram and per total tissue and summated tissue mitochondrial membrane surface areas. For the mammals and reptiles studied a 100% increase in body size resulted in average increases of 68% in internal organ size and 107% in skeletal muscle mass. Similarly, total organ mitochondrial membrane surface areas increase in mammals and reptiles by an average 54% and for skeletal muscle by an average 96%. These values are similar to increases in standard (54 and 71%) and maximum (73 and 77%) organismal metabolism values found by other authors for mammals and reptiles respectively. Although the allometric exponents (or rates of change with increasing body size) of the mitochondrial parameters in mammals and reptiles are statistically the same, in general the total amount of mitochondrial membrane surface area in the mammalian tissues are four times greater than found in the reptilian tissues. These differences were not the result of any single 'quantum' factor but are the result of the mammals having relatively larger tissues with a greater proportion of their volume occupied by mitochondria and to a lesser extent increases in the internal mitochondrial membrane surface area densities. Mitochondrial volume density from this present study would appear to be the major factor involved in changing weight specific metabolism of tissues both as a result of changes in body size and in the evolution of endothermy in mammals from reptiles. © 1985 Springer-Verlag.

UOW Authors


  •   Else, Paul
  •   Hulbert, Anthony (external author)

Publication Date


  • 1985

Citation


  • Else, P. L., & Hulbert, A. J. (1985). An allometric comparison of the mitochondria of mammalian and reptilian tissues: The implications for the evolution of endothermy. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 156(1), 3-11. doi:10.1007/BF00692920

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-0022177207

Start Page


  • 3

End Page


  • 11

Volume


  • 156

Issue


  • 1

Abstract


  • The effects of body size and phylogeny on metabolic capacities were examined by comparing the mitochondrial capacities of 6 mammalian and 4 reptilian species representing 100-fold body weight ranges. The mammals examined included 3 eutherian, 2 marsupial and a monotreme species and the reptiles 2 saurian, 1 crocodilian and 1 testudine species. The tissues examined were liver, kidney, brain, heart, lung and skeletal muscle. Allometric equations were derived for tissue weights, mitochondrial volume densities, internal mitochondrial membrane surface area densities, tissue mitochondrial membrane surface areas both per gram and per total tissue and summated tissue mitochondrial membrane surface areas. For the mammals and reptiles studied a 100% increase in body size resulted in average increases of 68% in internal organ size and 107% in skeletal muscle mass. Similarly, total organ mitochondrial membrane surface areas increase in mammals and reptiles by an average 54% and for skeletal muscle by an average 96%. These values are similar to increases in standard (54 and 71%) and maximum (73 and 77%) organismal metabolism values found by other authors for mammals and reptiles respectively. Although the allometric exponents (or rates of change with increasing body size) of the mitochondrial parameters in mammals and reptiles are statistically the same, in general the total amount of mitochondrial membrane surface area in the mammalian tissues are four times greater than found in the reptilian tissues. These differences were not the result of any single 'quantum' factor but are the result of the mammals having relatively larger tissues with a greater proportion of their volume occupied by mitochondria and to a lesser extent increases in the internal mitochondrial membrane surface area densities. Mitochondrial volume density from this present study would appear to be the major factor involved in changing weight specific metabolism of tissues both as a result of changes in body size and in the evolution of endothermy in mammals from reptiles. © 1985 Springer-Verlag.

UOW Authors


  •   Else, Paul
  •   Hulbert, Anthony (external author)

Publication Date


  • 1985

Citation


  • Else, P. L., & Hulbert, A. J. (1985). An allometric comparison of the mitochondria of mammalian and reptilian tissues: The implications for the evolution of endothermy. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 156(1), 3-11. doi:10.1007/BF00692920

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-0022177207

Start Page


  • 3

End Page


  • 11

Volume


  • 156

Issue


  • 1