Skip to main content
placeholder image

Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND DYING - Why don’t we talk about death and dying? We can choose so many of our life experiences, but it seems we can have no say in whether we die in pain or at peace. Today we look at the Australian government’s efforts to suppress discussion of euthanasia.

    There’s plenty of information available on how to kill yourself violently, so why does the Australian government so vigorously censor information on peaceful methods?

    Voluntary euthanasia societies have long been pushing to legalise death with dignity. According to opinion polls, a strong majority of Australians support legalisation, yet Australian governments have been unreceptive. When the Northern Territory government legalised euthanasia in 1996, the federal parliament overruled the law less than a year later.

    Philip Nitschke, despairing of the legal route, set up Exit International to enable people to learn how to obtain a peaceful death through their own initiative. Exit publications provide information about obtaining pentobarbital, commonly known as Nembutal, the drug of choice everywhere that death with dignity is legal.

Publication Date


  • 2011

Citation


  • Martin, B. (2011). Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate. The Conversation, (21 November),

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2573&context=lhapapers&unstamped=1

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/1568

Issue


  • 21 November

Place Of Publication


  • http://theconversation.com/deadly-censorship-games-keeping-a-tight-lid-on-the-euthanasia-debate-2549

Abstract


  • TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND DYING - Why don’t we talk about death and dying? We can choose so many of our life experiences, but it seems we can have no say in whether we die in pain or at peace. Today we look at the Australian government’s efforts to suppress discussion of euthanasia.

    There’s plenty of information available on how to kill yourself violently, so why does the Australian government so vigorously censor information on peaceful methods?

    Voluntary euthanasia societies have long been pushing to legalise death with dignity. According to opinion polls, a strong majority of Australians support legalisation, yet Australian governments have been unreceptive. When the Northern Territory government legalised euthanasia in 1996, the federal parliament overruled the law less than a year later.

    Philip Nitschke, despairing of the legal route, set up Exit International to enable people to learn how to obtain a peaceful death through their own initiative. Exit publications provide information about obtaining pentobarbital, commonly known as Nembutal, the drug of choice everywhere that death with dignity is legal.

Publication Date


  • 2011

Citation


  • Martin, B. (2011). Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate. The Conversation, (21 November),

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2573&context=lhapapers&unstamped=1

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/1568

Issue


  • 21 November

Place Of Publication


  • http://theconversation.com/deadly-censorship-games-keeping-a-tight-lid-on-the-euthanasia-debate-2549