Skip to main content

Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics

Journal Article


Abstract


  • This study investigated whether postural configuration has a significant effect upon the kinematics of arm movements when humans performed unconstrained reach movements to visual targets. Eight subjects were required to reach to static visual targets (unperturbed REACH movements) or correct reach movements when the position of a target unexpectedly changed during the execution of a planned movement (perturbed reaches, or online corrections, OC). Subjects were required to execute REACH and OC movements in sitting and standing (STAND) positions. The height of the targets, distance from the right shoulder (acromion) and eccentricity in terms of the body midline were standardized between the two postural conditions before movements begun. Unperturbed REACH movements were executed to a central target placed at 130 % of outstretched arm length, along the midline (0). Perturbed (OC) movements involved subjects initiating an arm movement to the 0° target upon its illumination. Two hundred milliseconds after the onset of the hand movement, the 0° target was extinguished and the target at 60° to the right of the midline (still at 130 % outstretched arm distance) illuminated. Subjects had to correct their reach movements online to the new target. Results demonstrated that, despite evident differences in postural kinematics between the four experimental conditions (e.g. pelvis obliquity and trunk/pelvis rotation), postural configuration had little or no effect upon the endpoint kinematics of the finger. Most importantly, the STAND position, with its greater postural constraints, did not affect the time taken to initiate an OC, nor did it lengthen the time taken to complete the REACH or OC movements. Our results suggest, therefore, that postural constraints are accounted for by the central nervous system when executing complex arm reaching movements.

Authors


  •   Hua, Silvia (external author)
  •   Leonard, Julia A. (external author)
  •   Hilderley, Alicia J. (external author)
  •   Stapley, Paul J.

Publication Date


  • 2013

Citation


  • Hua, S., Leonard, J. A., Hilderley, A. J. & Stapley, P. J. (2013). Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics. Experimental Brain Research, 227 (1), 63-78.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84877574528

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/856

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 15

Start Page


  • 63

End Page


  • 78

Volume


  • 227

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication


  • Germany

Abstract


  • This study investigated whether postural configuration has a significant effect upon the kinematics of arm movements when humans performed unconstrained reach movements to visual targets. Eight subjects were required to reach to static visual targets (unperturbed REACH movements) or correct reach movements when the position of a target unexpectedly changed during the execution of a planned movement (perturbed reaches, or online corrections, OC). Subjects were required to execute REACH and OC movements in sitting and standing (STAND) positions. The height of the targets, distance from the right shoulder (acromion) and eccentricity in terms of the body midline were standardized between the two postural conditions before movements begun. Unperturbed REACH movements were executed to a central target placed at 130 % of outstretched arm length, along the midline (0). Perturbed (OC) movements involved subjects initiating an arm movement to the 0° target upon its illumination. Two hundred milliseconds after the onset of the hand movement, the 0° target was extinguished and the target at 60° to the right of the midline (still at 130 % outstretched arm distance) illuminated. Subjects had to correct their reach movements online to the new target. Results demonstrated that, despite evident differences in postural kinematics between the four experimental conditions (e.g. pelvis obliquity and trunk/pelvis rotation), postural configuration had little or no effect upon the endpoint kinematics of the finger. Most importantly, the STAND position, with its greater postural constraints, did not affect the time taken to initiate an OC, nor did it lengthen the time taken to complete the REACH or OC movements. Our results suggest, therefore, that postural constraints are accounted for by the central nervous system when executing complex arm reaching movements.

Authors


  •   Hua, Silvia (external author)
  •   Leonard, Julia A. (external author)
  •   Hilderley, Alicia J. (external author)
  •   Stapley, Paul J.

Publication Date


  • 2013

Citation


  • Hua, S., Leonard, J. A., Hilderley, A. J. & Stapley, P. J. (2013). Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics. Experimental Brain Research, 227 (1), 63-78.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84877574528

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/856

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 15

Start Page


  • 63

End Page


  • 78

Volume


  • 227

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication


  • Germany