Skip to main content
placeholder image

A comparison of the effect of mobile phone use and alcohol consumption on driving simulation performance

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • Objective: The present study compared the effects of a variety of mobile phone usage conditions to different levels of alcohol intoxication on simulated driving performance and psychomotor vigilance.Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers participated in a crossover design in which each participant completed a simulated driving task on 2 days, separated by a 1-week washout period. On the mobile phone day, participants performed the simulated driving task under each of 4 conditions: no phone usage, a hands-free naturalistic conversation, a hands-free cognitively demanding conversation, and texting. On the alcohol day, participants performed the simulated driving task at four different blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels: 0.00, 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10. Driving performance was assessed by variables including time within target speed range, time spent speeding, braking reaction time, speed deviation, and lateral lane position deviation.Results: In the BAC 0.07 and 0.10 alcohol conditions, participants spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding and took longer to brake in the BAC 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10 than in the BAC 0.00 condition. In the mobile phone condition, participants took longer to brake in the natural hands-free conversation, cognitively demanding hands-free conversation and texting conditions and spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding in the cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and texting conditions. When comparing the 2 conditions, the naturalistic conversation was comparable to the legally permissible BAC level (0.04), and the cognitively demanding and texting conversations were similar to the BAC 0.07 to 0.10 results.Conclusion: The findings of the current laboratory study suggest that very simple conversations on a mobile phone may not represent a significant driving risk (compared to legally permissible BAC levels), whereas cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and particularly texting represent significant risks to driving. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Authors


  •   Leung, Sumie (external author)
  •   Croft, Rodney J.
  •   Jackson, Melinda L. (external author)
  •   Howard, Mark E. (external author)
  •   McKenzie, Raymond J. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2012

Citation


  • Leung, S., Croft, R. J., Jackson, M. L., Howard, M. E. & McKenzie, R. J. (2012). A comparison of the effect of mobile phone use and alcohol consumption on driving simulation performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13 (6), 566-574.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84869405636

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4242&context=hbspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/hbspapers/3190

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 8

Start Page


  • 566

End Page


  • 574

Volume


  • 13

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States

Abstract


  • Objective: The present study compared the effects of a variety of mobile phone usage conditions to different levels of alcohol intoxication on simulated driving performance and psychomotor vigilance.Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers participated in a crossover design in which each participant completed a simulated driving task on 2 days, separated by a 1-week washout period. On the mobile phone day, participants performed the simulated driving task under each of 4 conditions: no phone usage, a hands-free naturalistic conversation, a hands-free cognitively demanding conversation, and texting. On the alcohol day, participants performed the simulated driving task at four different blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels: 0.00, 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10. Driving performance was assessed by variables including time within target speed range, time spent speeding, braking reaction time, speed deviation, and lateral lane position deviation.Results: In the BAC 0.07 and 0.10 alcohol conditions, participants spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding and took longer to brake in the BAC 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10 than in the BAC 0.00 condition. In the mobile phone condition, participants took longer to brake in the natural hands-free conversation, cognitively demanding hands-free conversation and texting conditions and spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding in the cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and texting conditions. When comparing the 2 conditions, the naturalistic conversation was comparable to the legally permissible BAC level (0.04), and the cognitively demanding and texting conversations were similar to the BAC 0.07 to 0.10 results.Conclusion: The findings of the current laboratory study suggest that very simple conversations on a mobile phone may not represent a significant driving risk (compared to legally permissible BAC levels), whereas cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and particularly texting represent significant risks to driving. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Authors


  •   Leung, Sumie (external author)
  •   Croft, Rodney J.
  •   Jackson, Melinda L. (external author)
  •   Howard, Mark E. (external author)
  •   McKenzie, Raymond J. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2012

Citation


  • Leung, S., Croft, R. J., Jackson, M. L., Howard, M. E. & McKenzie, R. J. (2012). A comparison of the effect of mobile phone use and alcohol consumption on driving simulation performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13 (6), 566-574.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84869405636

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4242&context=hbspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/hbspapers/3190

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 8

Start Page


  • 566

End Page


  • 574

Volume


  • 13

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States