Skip to main content
placeholder image

Cross-Institutional Comparison of Mechanics Examinations: A Guide for the Curious

Conference Paper


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • This paper describes a process used for, and interim findings of a comparison of final mechanics exam papers for first year engineering mechanics courses at the University of Wollongong, the University of Tasmania, the University of Technology, Sydney, and the Australian Maritime College. The process developed for the purpose emphasized a transparent and sequenced approach to comparing the concepts included in each exam paper, as well as the level of difficulty of exam questions. The exercise was carried out remotely, using readily available communications technology, including telephone, email, and Skype teleconferencing. This process is an example of a simple, easy to implement, and readily transportable approach to cross-institutional peer review of assessments, and an effective way of enhancing collaborative links between engineering educators.

Authors


Publication Date


  • 2008

Citation


  • Goldfinch, T., McCarthy, T. J., Carew, A. L., Henderson, A., Gardner, A. & Thomas, G. (2008). Cross-Institutional Comparison of Mechanics Examinations: A Guide for the Curious. In L. Mann, A. Thompson & P. Howard (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1-8). Rockhampton, QLD: Faculty of Sicences, Engineering & Health, CQUniversity Australia.

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6749&context=engpapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/3818

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 8

Abstract


  • This paper describes a process used for, and interim findings of a comparison of final mechanics exam papers for first year engineering mechanics courses at the University of Wollongong, the University of Tasmania, the University of Technology, Sydney, and the Australian Maritime College. The process developed for the purpose emphasized a transparent and sequenced approach to comparing the concepts included in each exam paper, as well as the level of difficulty of exam questions. The exercise was carried out remotely, using readily available communications technology, including telephone, email, and Skype teleconferencing. This process is an example of a simple, easy to implement, and readily transportable approach to cross-institutional peer review of assessments, and an effective way of enhancing collaborative links between engineering educators.

Authors


Publication Date


  • 2008

Citation


  • Goldfinch, T., McCarthy, T. J., Carew, A. L., Henderson, A., Gardner, A. & Thomas, G. (2008). Cross-Institutional Comparison of Mechanics Examinations: A Guide for the Curious. In L. Mann, A. Thompson & P. Howard (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1-8). Rockhampton, QLD: Faculty of Sicences, Engineering & Health, CQUniversity Australia.

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6749&context=engpapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/3818

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 8