Skip to main content
placeholder image

Understanding processes of criminalisation: Insights from an Australian study of criminal law-making

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Criminalisation theory scholars have examined important questions regarding what behaviours should be criminalised and why. More recently, greater attention has been paid to linking normative accounts with empirical and historicised analyses of criminalisation practices. Building on recent work on modalities of criminalisation as a methodological tool for contextual criminalisation research, this article introduces a second analytical approach for better understanding how criminal laws are made: processes of criminalisation. We discuss the findings of a pilot study of 143 criminal law statutes enacted in three Australian jurisdictions (New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria) from 2012–2017. We conclude that a processes approach supports a nuanced appreciation of the conditions under which criminal law statutes are produced, and facilitates scrutiny of whether legislative enactments are evidence-based and a product of meaningful consultation and genuine democratic participation in law-making.

Authors


  •   McNamara, Luke J. (external author)
  •   Quilter, Julia A.
  •   Hogg, Russell G. (external author)
  •   Loughnan, Arlie (external author)
  •   Douglas, Heather (external author)
  •   Brown, David B. (external author)
  •   Farmer, Lindsay (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2019

Citation


  • L. McNamara, J. Quilter, R. Hogg, A. Loughnan, H. Douglas, D. Brown & L. Farmer, 'Understanding processes of criminalisation: Insights from an Australian study of criminal law-making' (2019) Online First Criminology & Criminal Justice 1-21.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85069850506

Number Of Pages


  • 20

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 21

Volume


  • Online First

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Criminalisation theory scholars have examined important questions regarding what behaviours should be criminalised and why. More recently, greater attention has been paid to linking normative accounts with empirical and historicised analyses of criminalisation practices. Building on recent work on modalities of criminalisation as a methodological tool for contextual criminalisation research, this article introduces a second analytical approach for better understanding how criminal laws are made: processes of criminalisation. We discuss the findings of a pilot study of 143 criminal law statutes enacted in three Australian jurisdictions (New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria) from 2012–2017. We conclude that a processes approach supports a nuanced appreciation of the conditions under which criminal law statutes are produced, and facilitates scrutiny of whether legislative enactments are evidence-based and a product of meaningful consultation and genuine democratic participation in law-making.

Authors


  •   McNamara, Luke J. (external author)
  •   Quilter, Julia A.
  •   Hogg, Russell G. (external author)
  •   Loughnan, Arlie (external author)
  •   Douglas, Heather (external author)
  •   Brown, David B. (external author)
  •   Farmer, Lindsay (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2019

Citation


  • L. McNamara, J. Quilter, R. Hogg, A. Loughnan, H. Douglas, D. Brown & L. Farmer, 'Understanding processes of criminalisation: Insights from an Australian study of criminal law-making' (2019) Online First Criminology & Criminal Justice 1-21.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85069850506

Number Of Pages


  • 20

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 21

Volume


  • Online First

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom