Skip to main content
placeholder image

Adaptation and validation of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool among registered nurses

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • Background: Clinical supervision of pre-registration nursing students has become an integral role of the registered nurse. The Clinical Supervision Self-assessment Tool relating to knowledge (CSAT–Knowledge) and the individual's skills (CSAT-Skills) of clinical supervision and comprising of 30 items each originally is widely used for nurses in Australia. However, the psychometric properties of this tool have not been previously reported.

    Objective: To adapt the Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool for nurses and to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified tool to measure registered nurses’ knowledge and skills regarding supervising pre-registration nursing students.

    Design: Instrument adaptation and psychometric testing.

    Participants/Settings: A convenience sample of 229 registered nurses in a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia.

    Method: A two-phase prospective study was conducted. Phase 1 involved the modification of the Clinical supervision Self-Assessment Tool, content validity and pilot testing of the modified version. Phase 2 included the psychometric testing of the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool (mCSAT–Knowledge; mCSAT-Skills).

    Results: The mCSAT–Knowledge and mCSAT-Skills comprised of 30 items each. The content validity of the mCSAT was considered satisfactory based on the feedback from the expert panel. Results of the exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure identified as: evaluating clinical learning; facilitating clinical learning and problem solving. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's alpha values >0.90. The construct validity was supported as nurses who had undertaken clinical supervision training demonstrated significantly higher clinical supervision knowledge and skills scores than those had no training.

    Conclusions: The findings provide empirical support for the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool as a valid measure of registered nurses’ knowledge and skills regarding the clinical supervision of pre-registration nursing students. The tool requires further psychometric testing in different samples of nurses to enable validation in other settings.

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Chigavazira, J., Fernandez, R., Mackay, M. & Lapkin, S. (2018). Adaptation and validation of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool among registered nurses. Nurse Education Today, 70 28-33.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85051623081

Ro Full-text Url


  • https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=smhpapers1

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers1/147

Number Of Pages


  • 5

Start Page


  • 28

End Page


  • 33

Volume


  • 70

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Background: Clinical supervision of pre-registration nursing students has become an integral role of the registered nurse. The Clinical Supervision Self-assessment Tool relating to knowledge (CSAT–Knowledge) and the individual's skills (CSAT-Skills) of clinical supervision and comprising of 30 items each originally is widely used for nurses in Australia. However, the psychometric properties of this tool have not been previously reported.

    Objective: To adapt the Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool for nurses and to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified tool to measure registered nurses’ knowledge and skills regarding supervising pre-registration nursing students.

    Design: Instrument adaptation and psychometric testing.

    Participants/Settings: A convenience sample of 229 registered nurses in a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia.

    Method: A two-phase prospective study was conducted. Phase 1 involved the modification of the Clinical supervision Self-Assessment Tool, content validity and pilot testing of the modified version. Phase 2 included the psychometric testing of the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool (mCSAT–Knowledge; mCSAT-Skills).

    Results: The mCSAT–Knowledge and mCSAT-Skills comprised of 30 items each. The content validity of the mCSAT was considered satisfactory based on the feedback from the expert panel. Results of the exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure identified as: evaluating clinical learning; facilitating clinical learning and problem solving. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's alpha values >0.90. The construct validity was supported as nurses who had undertaken clinical supervision training demonstrated significantly higher clinical supervision knowledge and skills scores than those had no training.

    Conclusions: The findings provide empirical support for the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool as a valid measure of registered nurses’ knowledge and skills regarding the clinical supervision of pre-registration nursing students. The tool requires further psychometric testing in different samples of nurses to enable validation in other settings.

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Chigavazira, J., Fernandez, R., Mackay, M. & Lapkin, S. (2018). Adaptation and validation of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool among registered nurses. Nurse Education Today, 70 28-33.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85051623081

Ro Full-text Url


  • https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=smhpapers1

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers1/147

Number Of Pages


  • 5

Start Page


  • 28

End Page


  • 33

Volume


  • 70

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom