Abstract
-
This article investigates how strategic culture influenced the decision-making of
Australia and Poland regarding the global coalition against the Islamic State. In
the coalition, Australia has followed its tradition of active participation in United
States-led operations, while Poland has embarked on a more cautious line,
thereby breaking with its previous policy of active participation. The article
examines how Australian and Polish responses to the coalition were shaped
by five cultural elements: dominant threat perception, core task of the armed
forces, strategic partners, experiences of participating in coalitions of the
willing, and approach to the international legality of expeditionary operations.
It finds that Australia and Poland differed on all five elements but that the
major differences are found in dominant threat perception and core task of
the armed forces.