Skip to main content
placeholder image

A Delphi Survey and Analysis of Expert Perspectives on One Health in Australia

Journal Article


Abstract


  • One Health (OH) is an interdisciplinary approach aiming to achieve optimal health for humans, animals and their environments. Case reports and systematic reviews of success are emerging; however, discussion of barriers and enablers of cross-sectoral collaboration are rare. A four-phase mixed-method Delphi survey of Australian human and animal health practitioners and policymakers (n = 52) explored areas of consensus and disagreement over: (1) the operational definition of OH; (2) potential for cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) key priorities for shaping the development of an OH response to significantly elevated zoonotic disease risk. Participants agreed OH is essential for effective infectious disease prevention and control, and on key priorities for outbreak responses, but disagreed over definitions and the relative priority of animal health and welfare and economic considerations. Strong support emerged among Australian experts for an OH approach. There was also recognition of the need to ensure cross-sectoral differences are addressed.

Authors


  •   Degeling, Chris
  •   Johnson, Jane (external author)
  •   Ward, Michael P. (external author)
  •   Wilson, Andrew (external author)
  •   Gilbert, Gwendolyn L. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • Degeling, C., Johnson, J., Ward, M., Wilson, A. & Gilbert, G. (2017). A Delphi Survey and Analysis of Expert Perspectives on One Health in Australia. Ecohealth, 14 (4), 783-792.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85027862623

Number Of Pages


  • 9

Start Page


  • 783

End Page


  • 792

Volume


  • 14

Issue


  • 4

Place Of Publication


  • United States

Abstract


  • One Health (OH) is an interdisciplinary approach aiming to achieve optimal health for humans, animals and their environments. Case reports and systematic reviews of success are emerging; however, discussion of barriers and enablers of cross-sectoral collaboration are rare. A four-phase mixed-method Delphi survey of Australian human and animal health practitioners and policymakers (n = 52) explored areas of consensus and disagreement over: (1) the operational definition of OH; (2) potential for cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) key priorities for shaping the development of an OH response to significantly elevated zoonotic disease risk. Participants agreed OH is essential for effective infectious disease prevention and control, and on key priorities for outbreak responses, but disagreed over definitions and the relative priority of animal health and welfare and economic considerations. Strong support emerged among Australian experts for an OH approach. There was also recognition of the need to ensure cross-sectoral differences are addressed.

Authors


  •   Degeling, Chris
  •   Johnson, Jane (external author)
  •   Ward, Michael P. (external author)
  •   Wilson, Andrew (external author)
  •   Gilbert, Gwendolyn L. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • Degeling, C., Johnson, J., Ward, M., Wilson, A. & Gilbert, G. (2017). A Delphi Survey and Analysis of Expert Perspectives on One Health in Australia. Ecohealth, 14 (4), 783-792.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85027862623

Number Of Pages


  • 9

Start Page


  • 783

End Page


  • 792

Volume


  • 14

Issue


  • 4

Place Of Publication


  • United States