Skip to main content
placeholder image

Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • Background

    Against a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning.

    Methods

    Two deliberative forums were carried out with members of the South Australian community. The forums were supported by a qualitative study with adults and youths, systematic reviews of the literature and the involvement of an extended group of academic experts and policy makers. The forum discussions were recorded with simultaneous transcription and analysed thematically.

    Results

    Participants allocated scarce resources of antiviral drugs and pandemic vaccine based on a desire to preserve society function in a time of crisis. Participants were divided on the acceptability of social distancing and quarantine measures. However, should such measures be adopted, they thought that reasonable financial, household and psychological support was essential. In addition, provided such support was present, the participants, in general, were willing to impose strict sanctions on those who violated quarantine and social distancing measures.

    Conclusions

    The recommendations from the forums suggest that the implementation of pandemic plans in a severe pandemic will be challenging, but not impossible. Implementation may be more successful if the public is engaged in pandemic planning before a pandemic, effective communication of key points is practiced before and during a pandemic and if judicious use is made of supportive measures to assist those in quarantine or affected by social isolation measures.

Authors


Publication Date


  • 2010

Citation


  • Braunack-Mayer, A. J., Street, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Givney, R., Moss, J. R. & Hiller, J. E. (2010). Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach. BMC Public Health, 10 (501), 1-9.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-77955707305

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4762&context=sspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/3753

Number Of Pages


  • 8

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 9

Volume


  • 10

Issue


  • 501

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Background

    Against a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning.

    Methods

    Two deliberative forums were carried out with members of the South Australian community. The forums were supported by a qualitative study with adults and youths, systematic reviews of the literature and the involvement of an extended group of academic experts and policy makers. The forum discussions were recorded with simultaneous transcription and analysed thematically.

    Results

    Participants allocated scarce resources of antiviral drugs and pandemic vaccine based on a desire to preserve society function in a time of crisis. Participants were divided on the acceptability of social distancing and quarantine measures. However, should such measures be adopted, they thought that reasonable financial, household and psychological support was essential. In addition, provided such support was present, the participants, in general, were willing to impose strict sanctions on those who violated quarantine and social distancing measures.

    Conclusions

    The recommendations from the forums suggest that the implementation of pandemic plans in a severe pandemic will be challenging, but not impossible. Implementation may be more successful if the public is engaged in pandemic planning before a pandemic, effective communication of key points is practiced before and during a pandemic and if judicious use is made of supportive measures to assist those in quarantine or affected by social isolation measures.

Authors


Publication Date


  • 2010

Citation


  • Braunack-Mayer, A. J., Street, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Givney, R., Moss, J. R. & Hiller, J. E. (2010). Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach. BMC Public Health, 10 (501), 1-9.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-77955707305

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4762&context=sspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/3753

Number Of Pages


  • 8

Start Page


  • 1

End Page


  • 9

Volume


  • 10

Issue


  • 501

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom