Skip to main content
placeholder image

(Dis)Engaging with Sustainability: Evidence from an Australian Business Faculty

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university’s

    strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the

    attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it

    attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.

    Design/methodology/approach – The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line

    survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses

    were analysed using Piderit’s (2000) notion of ambivalence.

    Findings – The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the

    university’s strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in

    their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university’s strategy and the extent of their intentions to

    support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future,

    change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the

    scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.

    Research limitations/implications – The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore,

    researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education

    using Piderit’s notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow

    a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university

    sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.

    Practical implications – The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability

    in higher education.

    Originality/value – This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with

    sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.

UOW Authors


  •   Dyball, Maria Cadiz. (external author)
  •   Wang, Andy
  •   Wright, Sue (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2015

Citation


  • Dyball, M. Cadiz., Wang, A. F. & Wright, S. (2015). (Dis)Engaging with Sustainability: Evidence from an Australian Business Faculty. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (1), 69-101.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84921869633

Number Of Pages


  • 32

Start Page


  • 69

End Page


  • 101

Volume


  • 28

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how the lack of staff engagement with a university’s

    strategy on sustainability could be an enabling lever for organisational change. It examines the

    attitudes and views of employees of a business faculty at an Australian metropolitan university as it

    attempts to adopt a holistic approach to sustainability.

    Design/methodology/approach – The paper opted for a case study using data from an on-line

    survey, semi-directed interviews with key management personnel and archival material. Responses

    were analysed using Piderit’s (2000) notion of ambivalence.

    Findings – The paper provides empirical insights into why staff lacked engagement with the

    university’s strategy on sustainability. It suggests that staff were ambivalent, displaying dissonance in

    their personal beliefs on sustainability, the university’s strategy and the extent of their intentions to

    support the university. Staff were willing to offer ideas on how the university could, in the future,

    change towards sustainability. These ideas allow the possibility for the university to learn to adjust the

    scope of the implementation of its sustainability strategy.

    Research limitations/implications – The research results may lack generalisability. Therefore,

    researchers are encouraged to further examine staff attitudes on sustainability in higher education

    using Piderit’s notion of ambivalence. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions could allow

    a better understanding of harmony and dissonance in cognition of and intention for university

    sustainability strategies and initiatives by academic, professional and sessional staff.

    Practical implications – The paper includes implications for staff engagement with sustainability

    in higher education.

    Originality/value – This paper fulfils an identified need to study how staff engagement with

    sustainability in higher education can be enabled for organisational learning.

UOW Authors


  •   Dyball, Maria Cadiz. (external author)
  •   Wang, Andy
  •   Wright, Sue (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2015

Citation


  • Dyball, M. Cadiz., Wang, A. F. & Wright, S. (2015). (Dis)Engaging with Sustainability: Evidence from an Australian Business Faculty. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (1), 69-101.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84921869633

Number Of Pages


  • 32

Start Page


  • 69

End Page


  • 101

Volume


  • 28

Issue


  • 1

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom