Skip to main content
placeholder image

Analysis and Comparison of the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Nodal Staging System in Cutaneous and Oral Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) uses the same nodal staging system for cutaneous and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in its 8th edition (AJCC 8) despite differences in the etiology, risk factors, and clinical behavior of the two diseases. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the AJCC 8 nodal staging system by direct comparison of cutaneous (cSCC) versus oral squamous cell carcinoma (oSCC) patients. Methods: Patients with metastatic cSCC (N = 382) and oSCC (N = 325) were identified from a prospective database (years 1987–2016). Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards competing risk model. To assess staging system performance, an explained variation measure (proportion of variation explained, PVE) as well as a discrimination measure (Harrell’s concordance index, C-index) were used. Results: Inclusion of extranodal extension (ENE) in AJCC 8 increased the proportion of patients in N3b category (48.7% in cSCC, 40.3% in oSCC). AJCC 8 stratified poorly with regards to risk of death from cSCC and oSCC and showed limited monotonicity of the nodal categories. Estimates of model performance revealed modest predictive capacity for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in oSCC (Harrell’s C of 0.66 in both) and weak predictive capacity in cSCC (Harrell’s C of 0.58 and 0.61, respectively). Conclusions: The AJCC 8 nodal staging system performs poorly in terms of stratifying survival by N category, especially in cSCC. The data indicate that cSCC merits an independent nodal staging system from that for mucosal SCC.

Authors


  •   Moeckelmann, Nikolaus (external author)
  •   Ebrahimi, Ardalan (external author)
  •   Dirven, Richard (external author)
  •   Liu, Jessica (external author)
  •   Low, Tsu-Hui (Hubert). (external author)
  •   Gupta, Ruta (external author)
  •   Ashford, Bruce G.
  •   Ch'ng, Sydney (external author)
  •   Palme, Carsten (external author)
  •   Clark, Jonathan (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Moeckelmann, N., Ebrahimi, A., Dirven, R., Liu, J., Low, T., Gupta, R., Ashford, B., Ch'ng, S., Palme, C. & Clark, J. R. (2018). Analysis and Comparison of the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Nodal Staging System in Cutaneous and Oral Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 25 (6), 1730-1736.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85040645823

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/ihmri/1222

Number Of Pages


  • 6

Start Page


  • 1730

End Page


  • 1736

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States

Abstract


  • Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) uses the same nodal staging system for cutaneous and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in its 8th edition (AJCC 8) despite differences in the etiology, risk factors, and clinical behavior of the two diseases. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the AJCC 8 nodal staging system by direct comparison of cutaneous (cSCC) versus oral squamous cell carcinoma (oSCC) patients. Methods: Patients with metastatic cSCC (N = 382) and oSCC (N = 325) were identified from a prospective database (years 1987–2016). Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards competing risk model. To assess staging system performance, an explained variation measure (proportion of variation explained, PVE) as well as a discrimination measure (Harrell’s concordance index, C-index) were used. Results: Inclusion of extranodal extension (ENE) in AJCC 8 increased the proportion of patients in N3b category (48.7% in cSCC, 40.3% in oSCC). AJCC 8 stratified poorly with regards to risk of death from cSCC and oSCC and showed limited monotonicity of the nodal categories. Estimates of model performance revealed modest predictive capacity for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in oSCC (Harrell’s C of 0.66 in both) and weak predictive capacity in cSCC (Harrell’s C of 0.58 and 0.61, respectively). Conclusions: The AJCC 8 nodal staging system performs poorly in terms of stratifying survival by N category, especially in cSCC. The data indicate that cSCC merits an independent nodal staging system from that for mucosal SCC.

Authors


  •   Moeckelmann, Nikolaus (external author)
  •   Ebrahimi, Ardalan (external author)
  •   Dirven, Richard (external author)
  •   Liu, Jessica (external author)
  •   Low, Tsu-Hui (Hubert). (external author)
  •   Gupta, Ruta (external author)
  •   Ashford, Bruce G.
  •   Ch'ng, Sydney (external author)
  •   Palme, Carsten (external author)
  •   Clark, Jonathan (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Moeckelmann, N., Ebrahimi, A., Dirven, R., Liu, J., Low, T., Gupta, R., Ashford, B., Ch'ng, S., Palme, C. & Clark, J. R. (2018). Analysis and Comparison of the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Nodal Staging System in Cutaneous and Oral Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 25 (6), 1730-1736.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85040645823

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/ihmri/1222

Number Of Pages


  • 6

Start Page


  • 1730

End Page


  • 1736

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States