placeholder image

A comparative content analysis of media reporting of sports betting in Australia: lessons for public health media advocacy approaches

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Background: Harmful gambling is a significant public health issue. There has been widespread discussion in the

    Australian media about the extent and impact of sports betting on the Australian community, particularly relating to

    young men and children. Given the role that the media plays in influencing policy change and political agendas, and the

    acknowledgement that media based advocacy is a fundamental component of successful advocacy campaigns, this

    research aimed to investigate how different stakeholder groups discuss sports betting within the Australian print media.

    The study uses this information to provide recommendations to guide public health media advocacy approaches.

    Methods: A quantitative content analysis of print media articles was conducted during two significant Parliamentary

    Inquiries about sports betting - (1) The Joint Select Committee Inquiry into the Advertising and Promotion of Gambling

    Services in Sport (2012/2013), and (2) 'The Review of Illegal Offshore Wagering (2015/2016). A total of 241 articles from 12

    daily Australian newspapers were analysed. Statistical analysis was used to compare frequency of, and changes in, themes,

    voices and perspectives over time.

    Results: Discussions about the marketing and communication of sports betting was a main theme in media reporting

    (n = 165, 68.5%), while discussions about gambling reform decreased significantly across the two time periods

    (p < 0.0001). The presence of sports betting industry (p < 0.0001), sporting code (p < 0.0001) and public health expert

    (p = 0.001) voices all increased significantly across the two time periods. There were very few (n = 11, 4.6%) voices from

    those who had experienced gambling harm. Finally, while there were significantly fewer articles taking the perspective

    that regulation changes were needed to protect vulnerable sub-populations (p < 0.0001), articles that had a neutral

    perspective about the need for regulation change increased significantly across the two time periods (p < 0.0001).

    Discussion and conclusions: Mapping the media reporting of sports betting is important in developing effective

    public health advocacy approaches. This study indicates that discussions about the marketing strategies utilised by

    the sports betting industry was still a main theme in media articles. However, discussions relating to sports betting

    reforms, in particular to protect individuals who may be vulnerable to the harm associated with these products and

    their promotional strategies (for example children and young men) decreased during the time periods. Public health

    advocates may seek to address the decrease in media reports about reform by developing clear evidence-based

    messages about why regulatory reform is needed, as well as the potential consequences of not implementing

    reforms. Working with organisations to build capacity for people who have experienced gambling harm may help

    ensure that individuals with a lived experience of harm have an increased voice in the media.

Authors


  •   David, Jennifer L. (external author)
  •   Thomas, Samantha L. (external author)
  •   Randle, Melanie
  •   Bowe, Steven (external author)
  •   Daube, Mike (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • J. L. David, S. L. Thomas, M. Randle, S. J. Bowe & M. Daube, "A comparative content analysis of media reporting of sports betting in Australia: lessons for public health media advocacy approaches", BMC Public Health 17 (2017) 878-1-878-13.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85034082576

Ro Metadata Url


  • ARC/DP140102210

Start Page


  • 878-1

End Page


  • 878-13

Volume


  • 17

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Background: Harmful gambling is a significant public health issue. There has been widespread discussion in the

    Australian media about the extent and impact of sports betting on the Australian community, particularly relating to

    young men and children. Given the role that the media plays in influencing policy change and political agendas, and the

    acknowledgement that media based advocacy is a fundamental component of successful advocacy campaigns, this

    research aimed to investigate how different stakeholder groups discuss sports betting within the Australian print media.

    The study uses this information to provide recommendations to guide public health media advocacy approaches.

    Methods: A quantitative content analysis of print media articles was conducted during two significant Parliamentary

    Inquiries about sports betting - (1) The Joint Select Committee Inquiry into the Advertising and Promotion of Gambling

    Services in Sport (2012/2013), and (2) 'The Review of Illegal Offshore Wagering (2015/2016). A total of 241 articles from 12

    daily Australian newspapers were analysed. Statistical analysis was used to compare frequency of, and changes in, themes,

    voices and perspectives over time.

    Results: Discussions about the marketing and communication of sports betting was a main theme in media reporting

    (n = 165, 68.5%), while discussions about gambling reform decreased significantly across the two time periods

    (p < 0.0001). The presence of sports betting industry (p < 0.0001), sporting code (p < 0.0001) and public health expert

    (p = 0.001) voices all increased significantly across the two time periods. There were very few (n = 11, 4.6%) voices from

    those who had experienced gambling harm. Finally, while there were significantly fewer articles taking the perspective

    that regulation changes were needed to protect vulnerable sub-populations (p < 0.0001), articles that had a neutral

    perspective about the need for regulation change increased significantly across the two time periods (p < 0.0001).

    Discussion and conclusions: Mapping the media reporting of sports betting is important in developing effective

    public health advocacy approaches. This study indicates that discussions about the marketing strategies utilised by

    the sports betting industry was still a main theme in media articles. However, discussions relating to sports betting

    reforms, in particular to protect individuals who may be vulnerable to the harm associated with these products and

    their promotional strategies (for example children and young men) decreased during the time periods. Public health

    advocates may seek to address the decrease in media reports about reform by developing clear evidence-based

    messages about why regulatory reform is needed, as well as the potential consequences of not implementing

    reforms. Working with organisations to build capacity for people who have experienced gambling harm may help

    ensure that individuals with a lived experience of harm have an increased voice in the media.

Authors


  •   David, Jennifer L. (external author)
  •   Thomas, Samantha L. (external author)
  •   Randle, Melanie
  •   Bowe, Steven (external author)
  •   Daube, Mike (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • J. L. David, S. L. Thomas, M. Randle, S. J. Bowe & M. Daube, "A comparative content analysis of media reporting of sports betting in Australia: lessons for public health media advocacy approaches", BMC Public Health 17 (2017) 878-1-878-13.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85034082576

Ro Metadata Url


  • ARC/DP140102210

Start Page


  • 878-1

End Page


  • 878-13

Volume


  • 17

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom