Skip to main content
placeholder image

Brandom and the Second Person

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Brandom is one of the main advocators of the idea that meaning is instituted within basic linguistic practices through mutual exchanges. The aim of this paper is to show that such framework cannot do the required job if the dynamics of mutual exchanges is understood in interpretational terms. After arguing that the interpretational framework does not work, the paper presents an alternative second-personal conversational model capable of meeting the challenge.

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • Satne, G. (2017). Brandom and the Second Person. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25 (2), 189-209.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85016116904

Number Of Pages


  • 20

Start Page


  • 189

End Page


  • 209

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 2

Abstract


  • Brandom is one of the main advocators of the idea that meaning is instituted within basic linguistic practices through mutual exchanges. The aim of this paper is to show that such framework cannot do the required job if the dynamics of mutual exchanges is understood in interpretational terms. After arguing that the interpretational framework does not work, the paper presents an alternative second-personal conversational model capable of meeting the challenge.

Publication Date


  • 2017

Citation


  • Satne, G. (2017). Brandom and the Second Person. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25 (2), 189-209.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85016116904

Number Of Pages


  • 20

Start Page


  • 189

End Page


  • 209

Volume


  • 25

Issue


  • 2