Skip to main content
placeholder image

The Work-Family Interface and Sleep Quality

Journal Article


Abstract


  • Objective: This article investigated whether work-to-family conflict (WFC) and work-to-family enrichment (WFE) were associated with employee sleep quality. WFC and WFE reflect the potential for experiences at work to negatively and positively influence nonworking life respectively, and may have implications for sleep quality. In this article, we examined whether WFC and WFE were linked with sleep quality via hedonic balance (i.e., positive affect relative to negative affect). Participants: The sample included 3,170 employed Australian parents involved in the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. Methods: Information on WFC, WFE, hedonic balance, sleep quality, and relevant covariates was collected through a structured interview and self-completion questionnaire. Results: WFC was associated with poorer sleep quality ((β = .27, p < .001), and this relationship was stronger in males than females and in dual parent-single income families. WFC was also found to be indirectly associated with poor sleep quality via a lower hedonic balance ((β = .17, 99% confidence interval [.14, .20]). WFE was not directly associated with sleep quality, but was indirectly associated with better sleep quality via a higher hedonic balance ((β = -.04 -.07, -.02]). Conclusions: These results indicate that aspects of the work-family interface are associated with employee sleep quality. Furthermore, affective experiences were found to link WFC and WFE with sleep quality. Workplace interventions that target WFC and WFE may have implications for employee sleep.

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Magee, C. A., Robinson, L. D. & McGregor, A. (2018). The Work-Family Interface and Sleep Quality. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 16 (6), 601-610.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85009817243

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2796

Number Of Pages


  • 9

Start Page


  • 601

End Page


  • 610

Volume


  • 16

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States

Abstract


  • Objective: This article investigated whether work-to-family conflict (WFC) and work-to-family enrichment (WFE) were associated with employee sleep quality. WFC and WFE reflect the potential for experiences at work to negatively and positively influence nonworking life respectively, and may have implications for sleep quality. In this article, we examined whether WFC and WFE were linked with sleep quality via hedonic balance (i.e., positive affect relative to negative affect). Participants: The sample included 3,170 employed Australian parents involved in the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. Methods: Information on WFC, WFE, hedonic balance, sleep quality, and relevant covariates was collected through a structured interview and self-completion questionnaire. Results: WFC was associated with poorer sleep quality ((β = .27, p < .001), and this relationship was stronger in males than females and in dual parent-single income families. WFC was also found to be indirectly associated with poor sleep quality via a lower hedonic balance ((β = .17, 99% confidence interval [.14, .20]). WFE was not directly associated with sleep quality, but was indirectly associated with better sleep quality via a higher hedonic balance ((β = -.04 -.07, -.02]). Conclusions: These results indicate that aspects of the work-family interface are associated with employee sleep quality. Furthermore, affective experiences were found to link WFC and WFE with sleep quality. Workplace interventions that target WFC and WFE may have implications for employee sleep.

Publication Date


  • 2018

Citation


  • Magee, C. A., Robinson, L. D. & McGregor, A. (2018). The Work-Family Interface and Sleep Quality. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 16 (6), 601-610.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-85009817243

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2796

Number Of Pages


  • 9

Start Page


  • 601

End Page


  • 610

Volume


  • 16

Issue


  • 6

Place Of Publication


  • United States