Skip to main content
placeholder image

Informed choice for screening: Implications for evaluation

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • Evaluation of screening should reflect consumer priorities. We need to make more effort to find out what they really are.

UOW Authors


  •   Irwig, Les (external author)
  •   McCaffery, Kirsten (external author)
  •   Salkeld, Glenn
  •   Bossuyt, Patrick (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2006

Citation


  • Irwig, L., McCaffery, K., Salkeld, G. & Bossuyt, P. (2006). Informed choice for screening: Implications for evaluation. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 332 (7550), 1148-1150.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-33646827017

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3737&context=sspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2735

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 2

Start Page


  • 1148

End Page


  • 1150

Volume


  • 332

Issue


  • 7550

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom

Abstract


  • Evaluation of screening should reflect consumer priorities. We need to make more effort to find out what they really are.

UOW Authors


  •   Irwig, Les (external author)
  •   McCaffery, Kirsten (external author)
  •   Salkeld, Glenn
  •   Bossuyt, Patrick (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2006

Citation


  • Irwig, L., McCaffery, K., Salkeld, G. & Bossuyt, P. (2006). Informed choice for screening: Implications for evaluation. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 332 (7550), 1148-1150.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-33646827017

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3737&context=sspapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2735

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 2

Start Page


  • 1148

End Page


  • 1150

Volume


  • 332

Issue


  • 7550

Place Of Publication


  • United Kingdom