Skip to main content
placeholder image

Criteria for assessing the quality of Middle Pleistocene to Holocene vertebrate fossil ages

Journal Article


Download full-text (Open Access)

Abstract


  • Confidence in fossil ages is a recognized constraint for understanding changes in archaeological and palaeontological records. Poor estimates of age can lead to erroneous inferences—such as timing of species arrival, range expansions and extinctions—preventing robust hypothesis testing of the causes and consequences of past events. Therefore, age reliability must be demonstrated before patterns and mechanisms are inferred. Here we present a generalized quality-rating scheme based on a two-stage set of objective criteria: first, our method assesses the reliability of an age regarding the dating procedure, and second, if the age is based on association, it assesses the confidence in its association with the target vertebrate fossil. We developed this quality rating specifically for Australian applications, but it could be applied to other regions and to longer timescales with some modification. Our method ranks ages in four categories of reliability (A* and A are reliable; B and C are unreliable). In our case study of the late Pleistocene megafauna of Sahul, accounting for reliability (i.e., accepting only reliable ages) reduced the number of useful records within chronologies by 70%; for most species, this greatly affects any inferences regarding the timing and possible drivers of extinction. Our method provides a simple, replicable and general tool for assessing the age quality of dated fossils, as well as provides a guide for selecting useful protocols and samples for dating.

UOW Authors


  •   Rodríguez-Reya, Marta (external author)
  •   Herrando-Péreza, Salvador (external author)
  •   Gillespie, Dizzy (external author)
  •   Jacobs, Zenobia
  •   Saltréa, Frédérik (external author)
  •   Brook, Barry W. (external author)
  •   Prideaux, Gavin J. (external author)
  •   Roberts, Richard
  •   Cooper, Alan (external author)
  •   Alroy, John (external author)
  •   Miller, Gifford H. (external author)
  •   Bird, Michael I. (external author)
  •   Johnson, Chris N. (external author)
  •   Beeton, Nicholas (external author)
  •   Turney, Chris (external author)
  •   Bradshaw, Corey J. A. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2015

Citation


  • Rodríguez-Reya, M., Herrando-Perez, S., Gillespie, R., Jacobs, Z., Saltréa, F., Brook, B. W., Prideaux, G. J., Roberts, R. G., Cooper, A., Alroy, J., Miller, G. H., Bird, M. I., Johnson, C. N., Beeton, N., Turney, C. S. M. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2015). Criteria for assessing the quality of Middle Pleistocene to Holocene vertebrate fossil ages. Quaternary Geochronology, 30 69-79.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84940778981

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4169&context=smhpapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/3146

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 10

Start Page


  • 69

End Page


  • 79

Volume


  • 30

Place Of Publication


  • Netherlands

Abstract


  • Confidence in fossil ages is a recognized constraint for understanding changes in archaeological and palaeontological records. Poor estimates of age can lead to erroneous inferences—such as timing of species arrival, range expansions and extinctions—preventing robust hypothesis testing of the causes and consequences of past events. Therefore, age reliability must be demonstrated before patterns and mechanisms are inferred. Here we present a generalized quality-rating scheme based on a two-stage set of objective criteria: first, our method assesses the reliability of an age regarding the dating procedure, and second, if the age is based on association, it assesses the confidence in its association with the target vertebrate fossil. We developed this quality rating specifically for Australian applications, but it could be applied to other regions and to longer timescales with some modification. Our method ranks ages in four categories of reliability (A* and A are reliable; B and C are unreliable). In our case study of the late Pleistocene megafauna of Sahul, accounting for reliability (i.e., accepting only reliable ages) reduced the number of useful records within chronologies by 70%; for most species, this greatly affects any inferences regarding the timing and possible drivers of extinction. Our method provides a simple, replicable and general tool for assessing the age quality of dated fossils, as well as provides a guide for selecting useful protocols and samples for dating.

UOW Authors


  •   Rodríguez-Reya, Marta (external author)
  •   Herrando-Péreza, Salvador (external author)
  •   Gillespie, Dizzy (external author)
  •   Jacobs, Zenobia
  •   Saltréa, Frédérik (external author)
  •   Brook, Barry W. (external author)
  •   Prideaux, Gavin J. (external author)
  •   Roberts, Richard
  •   Cooper, Alan (external author)
  •   Alroy, John (external author)
  •   Miller, Gifford H. (external author)
  •   Bird, Michael I. (external author)
  •   Johnson, Chris N. (external author)
  •   Beeton, Nicholas (external author)
  •   Turney, Chris (external author)
  •   Bradshaw, Corey J. A. (external author)

Publication Date


  • 2015

Citation


  • Rodríguez-Reya, M., Herrando-Perez, S., Gillespie, R., Jacobs, Z., Saltréa, F., Brook, B. W., Prideaux, G. J., Roberts, R. G., Cooper, A., Alroy, J., Miller, G. H., Bird, M. I., Johnson, C. N., Beeton, N., Turney, C. S. M. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2015). Criteria for assessing the quality of Middle Pleistocene to Holocene vertebrate fossil ages. Quaternary Geochronology, 30 69-79.

Scopus Eid


  • 2-s2.0-84940778981

Ro Full-text Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4169&context=smhpapers

Ro Metadata Url


  • http://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/3146

Has Global Citation Frequency


Number Of Pages


  • 10

Start Page


  • 69

End Page


  • 79

Volume


  • 30

Place Of Publication


  • Netherlands